|
 |
 |
| A
bi-weekly column with timely,
relevant and possibly irreverent
insight into the BC technology
industry.
|
|
 |
|
Something Ventured:
July 23th, 2007
By
Brent Holliday
Greenstone Venture Partners
A Strangeloop Coup
If you want it here it is, Come and get it.
Make your mind up fast.
If you want it anytime, I can give it.
But you better hurry, Cuz it may not last.” – Beatles,
Come And Get It
There are as many ways to plan, execute
and grow a start-up technology company as there are
stars in the universe. Books, seminars and the
occasional verbose columnist will tell you the “best”
way to grow your company, but best practices are always
applied to your particular circumstance. You have a
certain product to sell a certain way and a set of
talent and experience that constrains your choices. You
have a growth plan that is slow and organic or fast and
furious, depending on your market opportunity. When it
comes to financing your company, you do have choices as
well. There may be a best way to raise money for your
particular plan, which is why you should seek advice on
how to approach it.
Local technology company
Strangeloop
Networks is just announcing one of the largest Series A
round financings in Canadian history. This is news
because large technology financings that aren’t biotech
related are rare these days and any financings at all in
Canada are reasons to celebrate given the recent
slowdown in new company financing. So, the company that
brothers Jonathan and Joshua Bixby (no relation to Bill
Bixby, the Incredible Hulk, by the way) started just
over a year ago, raised $11.5M to attack their
particular opportunity in their particular way (more on
that in a minute).
But the real news for me is that
this was raised all from angels. Canadian angels. Like
Talent Technologies of Richmond, Strangeloop has managed
to raise way more than $10M (including their seed round)
from individual investors. This is no mean feat and it
deserves a lot of praise. In Talent’s case the approach
was dictated largely by the market as they raised a lot
of their money in the dark years of 2002 to 2004 when
venture capital funds were busy hiding under their
desks. But in Strangeloop’s case, the approach was
mostly by choice.
I talked to Jonathan Bixby about the
financing and the company. Their approach to raising
this money was focused on what they wanted from
financiers, money and top drawer expertise. They got
all that they wanted from the individuals that invested,
who are elite technology entrepreneurs themselves that
know the market that Strangeloop is entering. Jonathan
wanted to stress to me that, “We didn’t particularly
exclude VCs at all… we were able to go to our primary
targets, helped by our seed investors, and get
everything we need to go after our market opportunity
quickly.”
The conventional thinking in early stage
company financing is that individuals generally don’t
have the deep pockets or the risk profile to entirely
fund companies that require >$5M in total funding over
the lifetime of the company. Most angel investors
prefer to pepper a bunch of companies with smaller
amounts of seed capital and have that one huge success
in ten that more than pays for the rest. They rarely
“follow-on” which is investment in subsequent larger
rounds. So, why did Strangeloop’s investors throw
convention out the window? Why are they taking all the
risk with their own money and not sharing some of it
with venture investors? I’ll answer that after a brief
history of Strangeloop…
Joshua and Jonathan founded another decent
success story in Vancouver, Ironpoint Technologies,
which sold in 2005 to Active, the same company that
bought Class Software. Ironpoint was a SaaS application
company that allowed its customers to manage content on
their own web sites without downloading any software
tools. The company was built on the Microsoft ASP
platform, that more recently evolved into Microsoft
.Net. Like most technology companies, Strangeloop was
born of frustration with a particular process and a
“pain-relieving” idea to help others manage that
frustration. While at Ironpoint, the brothers became
increasingly frustrated with the slow, clunky and
limited performance of 1st generation web
applications. Even now, improvements to the underlying
platforms and the ascendance of AJAX to improve the user
experience still don’t deliver true “desktop-like”
applications mainly because we are still dealing with a
network connection.
In May of this year, Strangeloop announced
their network appliance, AppScaler, that helps
ameliorate issues with Microsoft based, dynamic web
applications. The company has some devices out in the
field today and is looking for full commercial launch in
early fall. The reason for the large Series A round,
one that must have been very dilutive to the founding
team’s ownership, is to attack the market very quickly.
Jonathan says the company wants to double its staff
almost immediately, grow the distribution and sales and
staff up the support team. He says that he will do most
of that locally, which is really interesting in a tight
labour market. If you look at the senior management
team, the company seems to be drawing from two
successes, Ironpoint and Abatis/Octiga Bay. As Jonathan
told me, the obvious starting point for them to get
world class talent is to draw from companies that knew
success, both technically and in the market. He also
said that the investors will help them find the best
possible talent because of their connections and
stature. I am very interested in following up with him
about finding talent for growth here in BC. It will be a
great case study in hiring, methinks.
Strangeloop appears to have taken the path
of “grow big or go home”. It’s their particular path for
their particular opportunity. They have sacrificed
company ownership for the chance to hit the market and
grab the lead. As Jonathan said, “There is no sense
waiting. The market is real, the opportunity is there
and we want to grow a very large and successful BC based
company.” Music to my ears as I have talked previously
that success breeds success and only big opportunities
like Strangeloop will attract big capital to this
province. Which brings me back to the interesting news
about this capital raise… their big capital did not come
from the typical sources. What does it take to get
individual investors to take this big of a bite?
Before you all go out and write a business
plan to raise $10M from individuals, remember this about
Strangeloop’s uniqueness… their management team was
proven. The only way to achieve this type of a
financing is to have a team of managers that have been
there, done that. You also have to be very lucky and
find individuals wealthy enough to write million dollar
cheques and be prepared to lose it all. That is a very
small crowd, I assure you.
Consider the path of financing chosen by
two Calgary based companies that were/are in the network
appliance space, not very different from Strangeloop.
Jasomi Networks raised their capital from founders and
individuals based on their proven team. But they got
their VoIP technology to market (in 2001), successfully
sold in the millions of revenue and were profitable on a
total cash raise of $6M. Total. Jasomi took a bare
bones approach (partly because of the brutal
environment) and left more of the company in the hands
of the founders. They sold successfully to DiTech
Communications in 2005 for around $30M. Their
individual investors did not/could not write the cheques
that Strangeloop’s investors have. And it worked out
for them. They achieved a nice return in a tough
market. If Strangeloop sells for $30M, it won’t have
been a success. They are on a different trajectory
altogether.
Wedge Networks in Calgary is doing a
similar path to Jasomi. Once again, no VC investors,
all individuals. They have a security appliance that is
already selling into the market. They have raised less
than $5M total, most from technology related
individuals. They have enough cash to execute their
current plan and might end up with a decent exit if they
execute. The key for Wedge getting their money was the
addition of a new CEO with previous success. But their
market opportunity may not require a $10M funding, like
Strangeloop.
Three different Canadian appliance
companies, similar in their funding source, but
different in their funding approach. Each could have
gone to VCs to fund, but did not. They had individuals
ready to back them giving them a choice, which is an
enviable place to be. Jasomi. Strangeloop. Wedge.
Sounds like a new golf club… or a salad at Glowbal.
Anyway, it will be interesting to track them and compare
their stories in a few years. Congrats to the team at
Strangeloop and good luck.
What Do You Think? Talk Back To Brent Holliday
Something Ventured is a bi-weekly column designed
to supplement the T-Net British Columbia web site with
some timely, relevant and possibly irreverent insight
into the industry. I hope to share some of the
perspective and trends that I see in my role as a VC.
The column is always followed by feedback (if its
positive or constructive. I'll keep the flames to
myself, thanks).
Something Ventured Archive
Printable edition
|