E-Learning for the BC Tech Industry: The Second Wave

An opinionated monthly column exploring the current use, future potential, and commercial value of e-learning in BC’s high tech sector.

E-Learning: The Second Wave:                                   February 2nd, 2001

By Paul Stacey

The second wave of e-learning is upon us. Justification for e-learning has been established and those who were early adopters have successfully piloted exemplars. The question is no longer "if" you should do e-learning but "how" to do e-learning. Those just getting started look to develop how-to action plans. Those with successful early pilots, look to scale up. The second wave brings dramatic increases in adoption and participation.

 

One way to think of this transition from justification to implementation is in terms of Geoffrey Moore's Technology Adoption Life Cycle. In my view Moore's ideas, expressed eloquently in his books Crossing the Chasm, Inside the Tornado and others should be required reading for everyone involved in technology. For a quick familiarization on some of Moore's basic concepts have a look at the Slide Set at http://www.chasmgroup.com/publications.htm.

 

Moore's Technology Adoption Life Cycle is shaped like a bell curve. Every technological advance begins with innovators who invent or develop a new application. Released into the marketplace these new technologies are picked up and used by early adopters. The number of users of a technology in these initial two stages is relatively small. However, if a technology works and provides significant benefits it crosses over what Moore calls the chasm into more widespread use by the early majority. Once it makes this transition the number of users starts to really increase as the bell curve swells.

 

In terms of technology adoption the past few years have seen e-learning transition through the innovator and early adopter stages. Now, having proven its effectiveness, e-learning has crossed the chasm and begins to move into the mainstream.

 

So the question becomes - how to do e-learning? Well there are lots of options. There are over 100 e-learning applications in the marketplace and more than 680 organizations supplying services or products in the e-learning space.

 

Some organizations have turned the responsibility for learning over to their employees.

 

Ford Motor Company and Delta Airlines have provided employees with a personal computer and Internet connection to do e-learning on their own time.

 

FedEx has established a $2,500 personal learning fund for each employee. This tax deferred learning account complete with a dollar spending limit allows employees to purchase e-learning consumed on their own time.

 

Left to their own employees can turn to e-learning portals such as Hungry Minds http://www.hungryminds.com or Thinq.com http://www.thinq.com. Another source of on-line offerings are universities and colleges who are putting more and more courses for credit on-line. The choices are rapidly growing.

 

Leaving employees to fend for themselves in the face of a plethora of vendor offerings creates a need for vendor neutral evaluations and reviews of e-learning offerings. The most prominent exchange, offering TV Guide like reviews of e-learning is LGuide http://www.lguide.com. If you are thinking of buying an e-learning course you might want to go to LGuide first and read what the reviewers have to say.

 

Another answer to the "how to do e-learning" question is a hosted solution from an Application Service Provider (ASP). Instead of spending time and money on evaluating, selecting and installing e-learning infrastructure, organizations that pursue a hosted solution are more interested in speed to market and getting e-learning content out to employees and customers as fast as possible.

 

Hosted solutions are generally of two types. Those who provide the infrastructure and content and those who provide just the infrastructure. Companies like Smartforce http://www.smartforce.com and NetG http://www.netg.com provide infrastructure and content. The hosted solutions from these companies are proprietary. You can only use their infrastructure to take their content. You can't develop and deploy your own content on their infrastructure. Neither can you use their infrastructure to take someone else's content.

 

The second type of ASP is where the provider gives you access to e-learning applications hosted on their e-learning infrastructure and servers. You use the e-learning applications provided to develop your own content which is installed and served up on their site. If your IT department is raising major roadblocks to an e-learning implementation based on concerns over traffic and bandwidth issues a hosted solution like this allows you to move forward with e-learning at a relatively low price point without impacting what might be perceived as more mission critical IT business systems. Application Service Providers offering this kind of solution include Blackboard http://www.blackboard.com and Docent http://www.docent.com among others. Even these solutions are somewhat proprietary in that content must be specifically developed using their tools for their infrastructure. The whole field of e-learning is maturing and with that maturation are coming standards that will allow for interoperability and easy porting of content from one e-learning platform to another - but that's a future column.

 

Most organizations view e-learning as an important business strategy over which they want more control. In addition the extensive firewall and security aspects of some company's Internet implementations prevent easy access to ASP solutions. These companies want to install e-learning infrastructure on their own internal IT infrastructure inside the firewall. Some of the suppliers mentioned above are not just ASP providers but also license their technologies to companies for internal implementations. Other new players are emerging including Canadian provider ISOPIA http://www.isopia.com.

 

The how-to do e-learning solutions for those who want to do it themselves are a little more complex and require more forethought and planning. Since starting to write this column I have been getting an increasing number of requests to provide e-learning consulting services. I recently changed my role at the Technical University to allow me to take on these kind of requests. Let me share with you in general terms some the second wave work I have been pursuing.

 

Educational institutions interested in e-learning solutions are engaged in second wave e-learning issues around organizational change, transformation, and readiness. At the recent EduCause National Learning Infrastructure Initiative (NLII) meeting I was impressed with a prototype web-based tool being developed for senior administrators that engages them with key issues related to assessing their organizations e-learning readiness in the areas of student support services, faculty engagement, learning technologies, and marketspace partnering.

 

You can get a sneak peek of the prototype version of this tool at http://www.educause.edu/ready. While targeted specifically at the needs of universities and colleges it nonetheless provides an excellent framework for any organization seeking self-assessment on a whole range of second wave e-learning issues.

 

In the private sector, organizations pursuing the do-it-yourself strategy are actively developing plans to operationalize their e-learning initiative by trying to answer such key questions as:

  • How will our e-learning be planned and managed?
  • What is the optimum business model for us to provide e-learning?
  • Who are the human resources that will create, deliver, and support our e-learning?
  • What are the e-learning success models and pedagogies that we should use for our e-learning?
  • What curriculum and content should we target for e-learning deployment and what business goals will it solve?
  • What educational technologies will we use to develop and deliver our e-learning?
  • What is the production process we will follow in developing our e-learning?
  • How will our e-learning be evaluated and revised over its life cycle?

In both the private and the public sectors one of the biggest second wave issues is establishing a common baseline understanding for everyone on just what e-learning is. It has been in the service of that goal that I write this column and have begun plans for an accompanying workshop. Hope it helps.

Another source for developing an understanding is the TechBC sponsored New Media BC E-Learning Special Interest Group (SIG). See the New Media BC web site http://www.newmediabc.com for upcoming local E-Learning SIG events.


Paul Stacey is the Director of Corporate Education and Training at the Technical University of British Columbia, a long time education professional in the high tech private sector, and an e-learner. Contact: Paul Stacey


What Do You Think? Talk Back To Paul Stacey



E-Learning: An opinionated monthly column exploring the current use, future potential, and commercial value of e-learning in BC’s high tech sector.

E-Learning Archive: