E-Learning for the BC Tech Industry: E-Learning Return On Investment (ROI)

An opinionated monthly column exploring the current use, future potential, and commercial value of e-learning in BC’s high tech sector.

E-Learning Return on Investment (ROI): May 31st, 2002

By Paul Stacey

For a given use of money in an enterprise, Return On Investment (ROI) is how much return, usually profit or cost savings, results. An ROI calculation is sometimes used along with other approaches to develop a business case. The overall ROI for an enterprise is sometimes used as a way to grade how well a company is managed.

(Definition courtesy of www.searchebusiness.com)

 

The ROI of e-learning has been a hot topic in the field for the past year or so. ROI is bringing the business case for training and education into focus in a way I've never seen before in my 20 years of education and training experience. It's an exciting development. If e-learning projects can show ROI, growth and expansion will follow.

 

So what am I talking about when I say e-learning ROI? Let me give you some examples.

 

I've been listening to e-learning ROI descriptions from all kinds of companies. Over the past two years I've heard:

  • reduced travel expenses (including flight costs, per diem, lodging, meals, etc.)

  • reduced time away from the workplace

  • access anytime anywhere

  • higher rates of innovation

  • reduced turnover

  • greater readiness, responsiveness, alignment

  • faster understanding, selling, utilization and service

  • time to change procedure

  • increased communication to vast numbers

  • better first 45 day experience for new employee

  • better first 45 minute experience for new customers

  • more loyal employees, vendors, and customers

  • tap more organizational intellect and productivity

and the list goes on and on.

 

How do you define your e-learning ROI? From the list above the answers are many and diverse. Yet I can't help be struck by some commonalities.

 

E-Learning ROI:

- is in dollars

- is defined as benefits

- measures outcomes

- presents a business case

 

Many of the E-Learning ROI descriptors are focused on enabling change, doing more, doing better, going faster. I think these are merely the tip of the iceberg.

 

Many of you may read the e-learning ROI descriptions above and wonder how you can create something similar for your organization.

 

ROI Approaches

 

There is no one right e-learning ROI definition. It varies depending on circumstances and the motivations behind e-learning use.

 

Are you looking for ways to improve productivity or performance and see e-learning as a tool to do so?

 

Do you work in the human resources department providing internal e-learning as a benefit to employees?

 

Are you a company delivering external customer training via e-learning, for a profit?

 

Are you transitioning your company from old economy to new economy and see e-learning as a change agent enabler?

 

For each scenario I expect the e-learning ROI would be different.

 

Still for many of you this will not really have been helpful. How do you go about defining e-learning ROI?

 

Part of the ROI challenge is building a frame of reference to get started.

 

ROI Frame of Reference

 

Donald Kirkpatrick's model for evaluation of training benefits is a popular place to start. This model considers the value of learning on four levels:

 

Level 1: The classic "happy sheet" given out to students at the end of a course surveys participants reaction to the training and what they plan to do with it.

 

Level 2: The achievement tests given throughout the training measure the new skills and knowledge participants have acquired.

 

Level 3: A post-training evaluation of whether the new skills and knowledge acquired successfully transferred to the job.

 

Level 4: An assessment of whether the employee's new skills and knowledge enabled the company to achieve a business goal.

 

To Kirkpatrick's original four levels of evaluation a fifth level has been added by Jack Phillips.

 

Level 5: Assesses whether the monetary value of the produced results exceeds the cost of training. Here finally is the ROI measure.

 

For a great overview of these concepts in the context of e-learning ROI I highly recommend you read:

Many Happy Returns: Calculating E-Learning ROI

http://www.learningcircuits.org/2001/jun2001 This excellent article also provides some practical formula.

 

Most e-learning ROI articles discuss e-learning ROI generically. I believe the e-learning ROI approach and measures depend on circumstances and motivation.

 

In a corporate context e-learning ROI for internal training will differ from e-learning ROI for external training. E-Learning ROI in a for-profit context will be different from e-learning ROI in a non-profit or public-service context.

 

Lets explore e-learning ROI in the context of corporate internal and external training.

 

Internal E-Learning ROI

 

Internal training is usually a Human Resource function provided to enhance employee professional development and performance. Traditionally internal training could be corporate-wide and mandatory or optional based on employee and job needs.

 

There is plenty of e-learning available for this HR function. Libraries of e-learning content exist for a multitude of skills and competencies. Corporate e-learning can be custom created.

 

What's exciting about e-learning is its growing use for company business objectives. E-learning isn't just about ethics training and learning the latest Microsoft product. Its about improving the bottom line. This significantly broadens ROI considerations around internal use of e-learning.

 

Some e-learning ROI's are being set and paid for by internal business units rather than HR. I am particularly intrigued by e-learning ROI around "time to market". Can e-learning for the sales force improve the speed to market of a new product or service?

 

Traditionally companies have perceived internal employee training as a cost. To senior management, money spent on internal training comes off the bottom line, reducing profits. This is the primary reason internal training budgets have been cut when times are tough.

 

E-learning ROI and the growing focus of e-learning around business objectives and the bottom line is changing that.

 

Historically, HR as administrators of internal employee training programs have not had to really show much ROI. Reports up to senior management might typically provide data on how many courses were offered, how many students took each course, total costs and maybe some basic level 1 and 2 evaluation data.

 

As we know from our model that's not really ROI. Business executives and managers are increasingly looking for ROI metrics to ensure e-learning investments contribute to profitability.

 

For internal training, e-learning's ROI is often described in terms of cost savings. This is done typically by showing that costs associated with an existing (or new) program can be reduced using e-learning. An obvious e-learning ROI is savings in travel expenses.

 

For a quick snapshot of the kind of travel cost savings you might achieve try out the Distance Learning Calculator.

 

The bigger challenge for internal e-learning is setting ROI measures around things like improved productivity and reduced turnover. But to me that challenge is just what is so exciting.

 

If internal training administrators measured and proved an ROI, budgets would be less likely to be cut and training's importance to the organization would be better substantiated.

 

Intriguingly training's importance to the bottom line has already been substantiated by an American Society for Training and Development study. The "Profiting from Learning" study shows a positive correlation between organizational training investments in one year and total shareholder return the following year. See ASTD's "Profiting from Learning" research white paper at www.astd.org/virtual_community/research 

 

External E-Learning ROI

 

External training is usually developed and delivered by a training department for customers of the company's products and services. This form of training is a profit centre to the company, contributing to the bottom line.

 

The circumstances and motivations of external training are different than those of internal training. As a profit centre external training has always had to show a dollars ROI. Revenue must exceed expenses.

 

Amazingly while many customers will spend huge amounts of money for a product, they frequently skimp on the training. In addition, using Kirkpatrick's model, most customers will pay for level 1 and level 2 evaluation but not usually for level 3 or level 4.

 

While customer learning benefits have always been described as part of the sale I think defining e-learning ROI for customers will become a new requirement.

 

What's exciting for me is the way e-learning opens up not just ways of doing external customer training better but the way it offers the ability to do things differently in a new way. This will prove fertile ground for new and different ROI measures.

 

Can external customer e-learning increase speed to revenue for the company?

 

Will external customer e-learning shorten time to use for customer adoption of a new technology?

 

Can external customer e-learning generate repeat sales and loyal customers?

 

Closing Thoughts

 

Internal and external training within a company are often done on a shoestring. I once worked for a company that took great pride in engineering world-class technology but couldn't really care less whether the customer ever really learned how to use it.

 

As an enterprise entity training and learning are often low in stature and importance. ROI brings an exciting business focus to e-learning. Use of e-learning ROI will go a long way to changing perceptions, stature, and the role of learning in an organization.

 

The use of e-learning to contribute to business goals and the revenue side of the balance sheet make e-learning a strategic corporate tool. Use it wisely. Define and measure e-learning ROI.

 

Further readings:

 

ROI for E-Learning

www.learningcircuits.org/2002/feb2002/moran.

 

The E-Learning Factor

www.internetweek.com/indepth/indepth110600.

 


Paul Stacey is an e-learning specialist in the corporate and higher education sectors. Paul is the Canadian correspondent for LearningWeek Live http://www.learningweek.com an interactive webcast from New York featuring stories about the people, technology, and business of learning. Contact: Paul Stacey


What Do You Think? Talk Back To Paul Stacey



E-Learning: An opinionated monthly column exploring the current use, future potential, and commercial value of e-learning in BC’s high tech sector.

E-Learning Archive: An index and links to all the E-learning columns Paul has written for T-Net going back to April 2000.