E-Learning for the BC Tech Industry: Moving Beyond Self-Paced Learning

An opinionated monthly column exploring the current use, future potential, and commercial value of e-learning in BC’s high tech sector.

Moving Beyond Self-Paced Learning

September 28th, 2001

By Paul Stacey

Access anywhere, anytime has been touted as one of the primary benefits of e-learning and for that matter the CD-ROM computer-based training (CBT) that came before it. More often than not this has led developers to choose a self-paced model of learning for their e-learning courses.

 

E-learning offerings from industry leaders like SmartForce (http://www.smartforce.com), DigitalThink (http://www.digitalthink.com), NetG (http://www.netg.com), and even local provider First Class Systems (http://www.firstclass.ca) are self-paced.

 

Self-paced learning lets you log on to courseware anytime of the day or night. Unlike a classroom where instruction may go too fast causing you to get lost, or too slow resulting in boredom, with self-paced learning you go as fast or as slow as you want. Often there is a learning path for you to follow and when you exit the course a bookmark lets you pickup from right where you left off next time you log on.

 

Sound good? Well yes and no.

 

Yes self-paced learning accommodates the time constrained life of a working professional and provides cost savings but ... it really doesn't fit the way most adults like to learn.

 

I've been developing and delivering learning programs for almost 20 years and evaluation feedback from those programs confirms over and over again - high quality learning experiences are social. Adults like to interact with and learn from the instructor and each other.

 

Adults want to hear first hand accounts of situations their peers and colleagues have lived through and lessons learned. They want to hear the success stories and failure stories of others. They want to discuss with others what works and what doesn't work. Adults want direct access to an instructor for questions and feedback.

 

What's not so good about self-paced learning is that it's impersonal and isolating. Without the camaraderie of classmates many e-learners lose motivation and drop out. Worse the absence of interaction fails to generate deep learning experiences.

 

Don't get me wrong I'm not advocating elimination of self-paced learning. It can be a useful method of learning for some subject matter. It may even suit the learning style of some adults. But it fails to leverage one of the biggest strengths of the Internet - interpersonal exchange of information, ideas, and discussion.

 

Commercial e-learning offerings for the corporate sector have predominately been self-paced. But that is changing.

 

Some of the mainstream vendors, including those mentioned at the beginning of this column, are taking steps.

 

SmartForce now has an open forum and threaded discussion area. DigitalThink has a threaded discussion area and a tutor you e-mail assignments and questions to. FirstClass has implemented eCoaching that tracks a student's progress and sends them brief reminders of what they have access to, how long they have access to it, helpful hints on time management, encouragement on progress, and congratulations on completion of their course(s).

 

Currently these features are primarily optional add-ons to the self-paced learning path of courses. Greater value will come when their use is instructionally designed in to the course as a key learning activity.

 

Another promising development is the burgeoning use of synchronous, live, online learning. Tools like Centra Symposium (http://www.centra.com), LearnLinc (http://www.mentergy.com), and Interwise (http://www.interwise.com) offer learners and instructors a kind of virtual classroom.

 

Synchronous e-learning integrates multi-way audio interaction (voice over IP) with collaborative classroom tools such as whiteboards, real-time response, polling and evaluations, video, record and playback for asynchronous learning, and controls for a highly structured virtual classroom environment. I am particularly impressed with the application sharing capabilities of these tools.

 

Instructors can segment learners into online work groups and provide them with a collaborative whiteboard and audio. Students sitting at a PC thousands of miles away can share applications, collaborate, and interact as if they were in the same room.

 

While self-paced learning has been the foundation for much of the e-learning content currently available I am most excited by learning models that move beyond self-paced learning and emphasize peer-to-peer and instructor-to-learner interaction.

 


Paul Stacey is the Director of Corporate Education and Training at the Technical University of British Columbia, a long time education professional in the high tech private sector, and an e-learner. Contact: Paul Stacey


What Do You Think? Talk Back To Paul Stacey



E-Learning: An opinionated monthly column exploring the current use, future potential, and commercial value of e-learning in BC’s high tech sector.

E-Learning Archive: